Helicobacter pylori (HP) management (including diagnosis and therapy) has been exhaustively reviewed in several reports.
These reports are unanimous in that several clinical conditions seriously hamper the diagnostic value of the two most commonly
used HP tests: 13C-Urea Breath Test (UBT) and Stool Antigen test (SAT), both false-negative and false-positive results
being not uncommon. Basically, these false-negative results are due to decreased bacterial loads in the stomach mucosa, and
include the following clinical conditions: 1) use of PPI medication; 2) use of antibiotics; 3) bleeding peptic ulcer; 4) atrophic
gastritis (AG; with or without intestinal metaplasia); 5) gastric cancer; 6) MALT lymphoma, and 7) partial gastrectomy. Since
the late 1990’s, it has been well established that UBT also gives false-positive results in cases where urease-producing bacterial
species are colonizing an acid-free stomach due to AG or a long term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). It is to be
emphasized that neither UBT nor SAT (or HP serology) is capable of diagnosing AG, caused by HP infection or autoimmune
disease, thus missing the patients at high risk for important clinical sequels of AG: I) gastric cancer (GC), ii) esophageal cancer,
iii) vitamin-B12 deficiency (due to malabsorption), and iv) malabsorption of calcium, iron, magnesium and certain medicines.
The understanding on the important role played by Helicobacter
pylori (HP) infection in pathogenesis of gastric cancer (GC) and
peptic ulcer disease has increased progressively since the discovery
of the bacteria in 1984 by Marshall and Warren.
According to the current concepts, GC develops from HP-infection
through precursor lesions of progressively increasing
severity: mild, moderate and severe atrophic gastritis (AG), ac
companied by intestinal metaplasia (IM) and dysplasia. This
sequence of events is generally known as the Correa cascade,
and estimated to be involved in around 50% of GC cases, particularly
the intestinal type of GC .
In parallel with the increased understanding of the pathogenetic
mechanisms, also the management of HP- infection has
undergone substantial development during the past decade.
In this context, management also covers the complex topics
related to the diagnosis of HP-infections. Much of this favorable
development can be attributed to the European Helicobacter
Study Group that took its first initiative in 1996 in
Maastricht to gather dedicated experts in the field to review
and discuss all relevant clinical data to arrive at recommendations
for the clinical management of HP infection. Since
then, these Maastricht conferences have been repeated every
4-5 years. Each of these conferences has yielded a Consensus
Report, the latest being the 4th in order, published in
2012. Attempts to standardize HP management (diagnosis
and treatment) within countries have led to several national
guidelines. In all these reports, considerable attention
has been paid to different diagnostic methods available for HP
detection, also including comprehensive review of the advantages
and limitations of each technique and their utility in different
settings, all based on updated literature.
No comments:
Post a Comment