Burnout is fast being recognized as a syndrome causing significant negative consequences for patients, doctors and health
institutions. Whereas the rates of burnout in the West for orthopaedic surgeons are high with roughly one in two orthopaedic
surgeons burned out; we found that the burn out rate in Indian orthopaedic surgeons is much lower at one in four.
Nonetheless, there is a need for a four-tiered approach to tackle the burnout epidemic.
Burnout is a syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation
and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment
among individuals who work with people in some capacity. Two common symptoms of burnout are treating patients
and colleagues as objects rather than as human beings and
feeling emotionally depleted. Doctors and other health care
workers are believed to be particularly susceptible to burnout
compared to the general public. Burnout syndrome
has gained traction in the medical community in the last two
decades, in part due to its consequences. Burnout leads to
increased rates of depression, health problems, suicide, alcohol
and drug abuse among doctors. Patients are less satisfied
with the care they receive from physicians experiencing burnout
and institutions are less productive and there is increased
absenteeism.
The use of a validated instrument to measure burnout, the
Maslach Burnout Inventory, allows for cross-study and crosscountry
comparison. In their nationwide cross-sectional study,
Shanafelt et al found a burnout rate of 50% for orthopaedic
surgeons in America, placing them in the top five list of
most burned out specialties. Of note, orthopaedic department
chairs had the lowest sense of personal accomplishment
among all specialty department chairs.
In our study (unpublished; Shetty and co-workers) of burnout
among Indian orthopaedic surgeons, we found a surprisingly
low rate of burnout (23%). With a heavier workload, less time
for professional development activities and high stress levels,
the burnout rate for Indian surgeons was hypothesized to be
more than their American counterparts. The low litigation rate
and the strong cultural and family bonds in the Indian population
may offset the work variables to some extent. A rider
here is that the Indian data was accumulated from surgeons
attending the annual orthopaedic society meeting, which may
lead to bias.
No comments:
Post a Comment