The history of clinical and medico-legal report case preparation is summarised. The development of an innovative medico-legal
commentary is described as a method of exploring the interface between clinical opinions and legal case reports
in the field of UK civil and criminal litigation. A pilot study to develop the process of documenting psychologically-relevant
commentaries is illustrated with a subsequent plan for its development outlined.
The science of medicine and its related professions has an
interesting relationship with the laws of evidence. Medical
experts attempt to show the relevance of their clinical experience
to litigation and occasionally the court room, drawing
on their work in assessment and treatment within a clinical
setting. Clinically, concepts of ‘proof’ and ‘causation’ exist but
not to the same level of evidential stringency as they do in
litigation. Effective treatment is predominantly linked to more
accurate current symptoms assessment than to background
history taking, although of course the latter is also important
a motivated ‘patient’ with current symptoms can utilise
therapeutic intervention to good effect despite its chronicity.
However, as the clinician moves into the medical-legal context,
the issues of causation, attribution and reliability come
much more into sharp focus and, here, they have had much to
learn from the legal colleagues. Whereas clinicians thrive on
multiplicity of disease theories and treatments, lawyers typically
aim for uniformity and avoidance of disparity, regarding
numerous medical viewpoints as contradictory and confusing.
Clinicians are experienced in preparing clinical reports in order
to communicate individual patient care findings to other
clinicians, their patients and other appropriate organisations.
These reports typically include symptom description, development
and causation, diagnosis, course and duration, and
prognosis and treatment. Guidelines for psychological clinical
case reports, in particular, are available in the literature. Clinicians also communicate their clinical findings to other
clinicians via case reports published in professional journals.
Guidelines are frequently available on how to prepare these
reports.
When working in a medico-legal context either in civil or criminal
proceedings, clinicians acting as ‘expert witnesses’ produce
medico-legal reports attesting to the extent of physical
or psychological injuries which may or may not have caused by
a negligent act of another or others (e.g. road accident, work
accident, medical accident). In the purely clinical report, emphasis
is placed more on diagnosis and treatment. In the medico-legal
report, requiring a more independent and impartial
stance, greater emphasis may well be placed on causation and
attribution, in addition to diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
No comments:
Post a Comment